Short answer: if the only reason you have After Effects is to run Motion Array templates, you're paying $54.99/month for software you may not actually need. AutoAE starts at $9.90/month and works in your browser — no AE required.
Here's what each tool actually costs, what it requires, and when each one makes sense.
| Motion Array | AutoAE | |
|---|---|---|
| Yes (most templates) |
| No — browser only |
| Tool cost | ~$30/month (verify) | from $9.90/month |
| + AE if needed | +$54.99/month (verify) | $0 |
| Realistic monthly cost | ~$85/month | $9.90–$24.90/month |
| Best For | AE users who want template assets | Creators who want motion graphics without AE |
| Output quality | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Ease of use | 3/5 (requires AE knowledge) | 5/5 |
| Speed to output | Slow | Fast |
| Commercial license | ✅ | ✅ (paid plans) |
Yes — for most of what Motion Array offers, After Effects is required.
Motion Array's catalog is primarily built for AE. Their best templates — the cinematic intros, smooth animated titles, complex transitions — all open as .aep files. Some newer templates support Premiere Pro directly, but if you browse Motion Array's library, the stuff that actually looks impressive is locked behind AE.
I've seen this fail when a new creator buys the Motion Array subscription, downloads a template they love, and then opens it to find: "After Effects CS6 or newer required." They didn't budget for another $55/month. That's not Motion Array's fault exactly — it's a mismatch between what the catalog promises visually and what it actually costs to run.
What you realistically need for Motion Array:
Total realistic cost: ~$85/month — before you've made a single video.
AutoAE is a different category. It's not a template library you download and open in software. It's a browser-based motion graphics generator — you describe what you need, AI matches you to a template, fills the content, and you render and download. Done. No After Effects. No Adobe Creative Cloud. No software installation.
What AutoAE does well:
What AutoAE doesn't do:
The workflow that works: use AutoAE for the 5-second hook or animated title, then bring that clip into CapCut or Premiere Pro for the full edit. In my experience, that "snippet first, edit second" approach is actually faster than trying to do everything in one place. The motion graphics moment is the hardest to nail quickly — AutoAE solves exactly that.
The monthly fee is the visible cost. Here's what doesn't show up on the billing statement:
1. Learning AE takes weeks. If you're not already proficient, you're looking at 2–4 weeks of YouTube tutorials before you can reliably modify a complex template. That's time not spent making content.
2. Customizing templates takes longer than you think. Even experienced AE users spend 30–90 minutes per complex template. Changing fonts, colors, and timing across multiple layers is not drag-and-drop. AutoAE: closer to 5 minutes.
3. Render time depends on your machine. Local AE renders tie up your computer. Browser-based rendering doesn't.
Over 12 months, if you're spending 90 minutes a week just inside AE on template work:
AutoAE at Creator tier: ~$299/year. Time per use: under 10 minutes.
Choose Motion Array + After Effects if:
Choose AutoAE if:
The combination that works for some creators:
AutoAE for regular weekly content, Motion Array for the occasional high-production video where you need something more elaborate. That only makes sense if you're already paying for AE for other work — not if AE is just sitting there as a template runner.
AutoAE is used by 700,000+ creators globally for exactly this reason: they want motion graphics quality without the AE overhead.
Do you need After Effects to use Motion Array?
For most Motion Array templates, yes. Their catalog is primarily built for After Effects .aep files. Some templates support Premiere Pro directly, but the core library — animated intros, cinematic transitions, complex motion graphics — requires After Effects.
What is the best Motion Array alternative that doesn't require After Effects?
AutoAE is the most direct alternative for creators who want professional motion graphics without installing After Effects. It's browser-based, requires no software, and starts at $9.90/month with a free tier available.
Is Motion Array worth it in 2026?
If you already use After Effects as part of your workflow, yes — the template library is genuinely high quality and the pricing makes sense. If you'd need to add AE specifically for Motion Array, the combined cost (~$85/month) rarely makes sense for most content creators.
What's the difference between Motion Array and AutoAE?
Motion Array is a downloadable template library that requires After Effects (or Premiere Pro for some templates) to use. AutoAE is a browser-based motion graphics generator — you get the finished output in the browser, no software required.
Can AutoAE replace Motion Array completely?
For most content creators focused on hooks, intros, and short-form visuals — yes. For complex, heavily customized professional motion design where you need full AE layer control, Motion Array + AE still has a higher ceiling.
Start free at autoae.online — 5 downloads per month, no credit card required.